RDP enhancement utility

May 28th, 2009

I often have many RDP sessions open at the same time, connected to my client’s systems. I like to run them in full screen, and usually there is no problem. Until, you reboot a server, then realize you were in the wrong RDP session!

BGInfo (populates the desktop background with system information) can assist with helping to identify the server, however if you’ve seen one BGInfo you’ve seen them all.

I came across Terminals this morning while I was looking for plugins for Microsoft Dynamics CRM. It lets you manage multiple RDP sessions, keep a list of hosts you regularly connect to (no more relying on most-recently-used lists or icons on the desktop), and comes with a swag of handy network tools all built in.

In a workplace that is all about becoming more efficient, Terminals is a huge improvement over the regular mstsc.exe experience.

Hit up here: http://www.codeplex.com/Terminals

Innovative use of technology

May 18th, 2009

I stumbled upon this project recently - www.fleetdynamics.com.au -  and have had some time speaking to the lead developer. It is essentially a GPS tracking system for vehicles, built by combining the Google Maps API, whizbang communications hardware, and some very cool .NET code. A great example of technology brought together to achieve something with real world value.

It’ll let you track your vehicles by polling the GPS grid every few seconds, then uploading the data to their servers via the mobile phone network. If you’ve got no mobile coverage, the unit queues the data until there is sufficient signal to transmit, and then uploads. It’ll cost you an initial $450 for a single unit, but that provides a years worth of tracking, and then it changes to a yearly subscription service of $90 every year thereafter.

There are comprehensive reports available too, such as travel outside of specific time frames, travel outside a specific radius, and travel over a certain speed, together with the usual plotting of routes, directions, altitudes, and speeds.

Check it out!

The value of vendor certification

May 13th, 2009

I have always been troubled by vendor certification. I find it really difficult to justify spending several thousands of dollars on learning a technology, only to have to sit a refresher course in a few years time, or have to sit a brand new course because the last course is now obsolete.

As I’m learning up on a whole suite of new technologies at the moment, like VMware’s offerings, and Symantec’s security and backup technologies, I find that most of the information I already know due to experience. Of all the free online presentation/quiz style “entry-level” certifications, I enjoyed VMware’s the most, but the next step up is costly.

Being an IT professional, I don’t have five days to set aside my regular duties and engage in a classroom style course, and being a small business owner in a slow economy, I don’t have the massive amounts of cash required to actually sit the courses anyway.

Even if the funding wasn’t an issue, justifying the expense is difficult, considering that it won’t be long until that course and information set has been superseded.

So, I have a few questions for the community:

  • What are your experiences with vendor certification?
  • Do you think the costs are justified in most cases?
  • Which vendor gives the biggest bang-for-your-buck in their certification (think not only up front cost, but longevity of the product, possible returns for the business, etc)?
  • What do you think of hardware certification?

VMware Sales Professional

April 24th, 2009

I have just cruised through examinations and earned myself a VMware Sales Professional accreditation, as well as the company now holds the title of VMware Services Provider Partner. Yay us!

This is the first of many new certifications and accreditations to come, as well as many new partner programs.

Look out Dell and HP!

unix timestamp 1234567890

February 16th, 2009

Damn. Missed it. It was Feb 13 23:31:30 2009 UTC.

Moving ahead with new technology

January 23rd, 2009

Mid January we upgraded our SBS2003 box to SBS2008. As there is no in-place upgrade (due to differing architectures), the choices are:

  • install SBS2008 on a new server
  • convert the SBS2003 to a virtual machine, wipe the existing server, install SBS2008 on existing server.

We went down the road of the second option, and overall the install process was satisfactory. We did run into some snags, as during the first attempt of installing SBS2008 the process crashed. The following attempt the server seemed to get ’stuck’, waiting for response from the SBS2003 VM.

The problem in the second attempt was that the 2008 install had transferred the domain operations master, infrastructure master, schema master, and other roles away from 2003 in the first install attempt. When the second install tried to do this, it could not complete this step and was stuck. The 2008 installer did not give any reason for the problem, so we had to manually figure it out.

The roles were seized back to the 2003 server using NTDSUTIL, and the next install attempt was much more successful!

I am very impressed with the SBS2008 system. We manage our client’s SBS boxes, rather than letting them do it, so even from an experienced point of view, SBS2008 is really quite good. I don’t like how WSUS is automatically enabled; I think this should be one of the ‘Getting Started Tasks’. I do like how easy it is to relocate an Exchange store, WSUS data, shared folders, etc, to another drive via the SBS Console.

Once running, configured, and stable, VMWare Server v2 was installed, and a Ubuntu linux virtual machine installed as the first VM on the system. With the Ubuntu VM we run an in house lab for PHP web development. I’m undecided about Ubuntu, after spending five years with FreeBSD. Our first project on this lab VM is a redevelopment of our client management system, something which has been on hold for about a year. More on the project to come in later posts.

Positive outcomes from server failures

October 1st, 2008

Well, the September quarter is done and dusted, and if it weren’t for a few busy weeks of fixing servers it would have been pretty quiet. The past few days however have seen numerous PC failures - it is as if the servers work fine while the workstations have issues, and the workstations work fine when the servers are down. If only the users would work fine 10% of the time :)

In the past six months I have gone through two serious (one of them majorly serious) failures relating to the same server. I’ve noticed there are two good things to come out of a serious server crash/outage. When I say serious, it is on the level where it impacts the majority of the organization for longer than 24 hours, however only time is lost, all company data is safe.

Read the rest of this entry »

SBS 2003 to Exchange 2007 migration

September 26th, 2008

One of our clients currently runs an SBS 2003 system on some hardware that has hard its fair share of trouble (one week of downtime earlier this year, and two days of downtime in August), resulting in a decision from management to move the e-mails to a new box, and rebuild the SBS into a vanilla Win2K3 Server system.

For the new Exchange box, we ended up with a Dell PowerEdge 2950 III with two RAID 1 arrays, dual quad-core, 4GB RAM, etc. It arrived about a week earlier than scheduled, and so far has been a breeze to work with. Read the rest of this entry »

Back to Blogging

August 28th, 2008

After a lengthy hiatus, I had the urge to start blogging again. This time I won’t be ranting on about useless junk, and focusing more on my corporate identity and the challenges, successes, and failures we’ve had along the way.

Since 2003 I have run a small IT company, nothing fancy, and we have several loyal clients who we have worked with since the inception of their company, or have had a significant role in their expansion. They will remain anonymous, as will the identity of my company. I’m sure eventually someone will figure it out though..

We’ve got a number of projects going on at the moment, and with only two staff it is pretty hectic. Two of the projects involve fit out of new offices full of IT gear; one is for around 25 staff and is a branch office, the other involves a fit out for a smaller company involved in research, who in time may expand.

Another project we have going is an on going information and document management trial/implementation of Microsoft Sharepoint (WSS3) for another group. Add in the regular maintenance, trouble shooting, repairs, and medium-level IT management, and you’ll start to get the picture that we’re pretty busy.

Anyway, on to the blogging..